User contributions for 66.108.248.77

7 August 2015

• 12:1212:12, 7 August 2015 diff hist −671 Talk:Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy Removed problematically placed comment. Will try again in time, or intend to.
• 11:5711:57, 7 August 2015 diff hist +1,297 Talk:Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy No edit summary
• 05:4205:42, 7 August 2015 diff hist +603 Calculus Jesus--hopefully fixed up any damage done in a gigantic, unintended edit. The introduction feels top-heavy, but balanced re: Newton and Leibniz, while acknowledging Liebniz's role as 2nd creator as 'controversial', which seems both accurate & nonspecific

6 August 2015

• 21:0321:03, 6 August 2015 diff hist +1,019 User talk:66.108.248.77 No edit summary
• 20:3720:37, 6 August 2015 diff hist +49 User talk:66.108.248.77 No edit summary
• 20:3520:35, 6 August 2015 diff hist +7,868 User talk:66.108.248.77 →CA strongly objects to the automatic reversal of his/her fixing non-neutral language and one large piece of, frankly, grossly-false, content.: new section
• 17:3817:38, 6 August 2015 diff hist +124 Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy Whether Leibniz made use of the manuscript from which he had copied extracts "[seriously...? Seriously. He recopied 'De Analysi'-in script, not printed-in his own notations--it's probably somewhere on this page.]" CA -
• 17:3217:32, 6 August 2015 diff hist −37 Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy →Development: statement: 'the debate cont'd for many years' after Leibniz's death,' (uncited), is absolutely false, with Leibniz dying in disgrace and exile and Newton accepted until c. 1950 as the sole inventor. The debate was over. (Jesus).
• 17:2517:25, 6 August 2015 diff hist +18 Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy →Background: 'known' implies certainty on the issue - changed to 'of which there was no direct evidence of' [at the time]. Since it's not 'known', the latter is more correct. - CA
• 17:2117:21, 6 August 2015 diff hist −32 Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy →Background: "Newton manipulated the quarrel" removed - no attribution, also false in comparison with Liebniz's machinations and slanders [no citation needed by the academic rule that I could find three or more such] - CA (not a partisan for Newton)

5 August 2015

• 17:0317:03, 5 August 2015 diff hist +6,240 User talk:DVdm →On modifications to the history of calculus, and subsequent reversion, though much that was changed was also not sourced.: new section
• 12:2812:28, 5 August 2015 diff hist −27 Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy →Background: Removed a presumption of bias made without evidence (presumed as part of the modern narrative of presumed dual-independent development, a consensus also remarkable for its inadequate supporting evidence)
• 11:2111:21, 5 August 2015 diff hist +566 Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy →Background
• 10:3310:33, 5 August 2015 diff hist +388 Calculus CA - I know people love the dual-invention theory, but this heading is altered to reflect why the Calculus Inquest correctly came down on the side of Newton, and the intellectual community of Europe even more strongly--without this challenged until 1900
• 10:1710:17, 5 August 2015 diff hist 0 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Added more neutrality (and nuance concerning complexity of his Constitutional Deity conception of God, and its effects on 'Candide's level of inaccuracy; added from Inquest that concrete evidence WAS discovered he'd directly borrowed from Newton.
• 10:0910:09, 5 August 2015 diff hist +1,241 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz →Posthumous reputation

31 July 2015

• 01:1201:12, 31 July 2015 diff hist +33 Fifth Party System No edit summary
• 01:1101:11, 31 July 2015 diff hist +980 Fifth Party System CA - Added note on 6th party system. Which should be its own article. The political realignments of 1968 and, to a lesser extent, 1980, changed the focus and structure of both parties. It makes no sense to lump today's political era in with Harry Truman's

30 July 2015

• 19:1519:15, 30 July 2015 diff hist +3 Old Right (United States) No edit summary
• 19:1419:14, 30 July 2015 diff hist +2,414 Old Right (United States) CA - connected to larger paleoconservative history arc - Coolidge/Hoover, New Deal and shift in name to 'Conservative', dropping of isolationism in 1952, etc.
• 18:3518:35, 30 July 2015 diff hist −1 Old Right (United States) →Legacy
• 18:3418:34, 30 July 2015 diff hist +301 Old Right (United States) →Legacy: -CA: -Added Old Right's history of isolationist connection with opposition to the US involvement in any part of the second World War.
• 17:5017:50, 30 July 2015 diff hist −10 Republicanism in the United States Gives correct formal title (and historical continuity) to the Jefferson/Madison 'Democratic-Republican' party, rather than giving an incorrect name.
• 17:4717:47, 30 July 2015 diff hist +15 Republicanism in the United States No edit summary
• 17:4217:42, 30 July 2015 diff hist +415 Republicanism in the United States Qualified 'the guiding philosophy' slightly, partly re-stating it as a 'model' and adding that considerably direct democracy exists on the lower echelon of the US's federalized structure.
• 17:0717:07, 30 July 2015 diff hist +1 1824 United States presidential election No edit summary
• 17:0617:06, 30 July 2015 diff hist +171 1824 United States presidential election No edit summary
• 16:5816:58, 30 July 2015 diff hist +421 1824 United States presidential election Changed wording for precision regarding the takeover of the rump Democratic-Republicans by the Jacksonians, as well as the National Republican coalition and their slightly looser-than-suggested relation to the Whig Party.

19 July 2015

• 22:4122:41, 19 July 2015 diff hist −35 Books of Swords Preserves appropriate content on 'Ariane' without excessive spoilers.
• 22:3822:38, 19 July 2015 diff hist +44 Books of Swords →Ariane
• 22:3322:33, 19 July 2015 diff hist +600 Books of Swords →Demons

16 July 2015

• 15:5915:59, 16 July 2015 diff hist +45 M2 Browning No edit summary

24 June 2015

• 21:2721:27, 24 June 2015 diff hist +1,992 Talk:New Deal →Merge

10 February 2015

• 09:5609:56, 10 February 2015 diff hist +380 Talk:Simon de Montfort, 6th Earl of Leicester →Clarify, please
• 09:4309:43, 10 February 2015 diff hist +2,017 Talk:Simon de Montfort, 6th Earl of Leicester →War with the King