Trish's Reviews > Watchmen

Watchmen by Alan             Moore
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
653338
's review

it was ok

** spoiler alert ** Aaron's been telling me for a long time that I should read a select few of his favorite comic books. And I haven't been avoiding them. But when I'm looking around the house for something to read, I forget to wander over to the comics section. So finally he just made a stack of books for me, and I started with Watchmen.

And within the first few pages I was testing his patience with questions/comments including:

"Why is Rorshach the hero when he's clearly insane?"
"None of these people are very pleasant."
"Why doesn't Laurie shut up?"
"Seriously. When does Laurie shut up?"
"Are any of these people not crazy?"
"The Comedian is a stupid super-hero name."
"I'm not good at looking at the pictures for information."
"I like the text parts between the chapters."

He told me that if I wasn't enjoying it I should just stop (and he was probably thinking, "If she doesn't like whining, then why doesn't she shut up?"). But I said it wasn't that I wasn't enjoying it--well, I wasn't enjoying it, but I was appreciating it.

And that's my final verdict, I guess. I didn't enjoy it, exactly, because I don't think you're supposed to *enjoy* a story in which at least three-fifths of the characters are certifiably insane or at least significantly imbalanced and in which New York City becomes a body-choked charnel house.

But I did *appreciate* the signficance of the book, I think. I think I understand, at least academically if not viscerally, the sea change this must have represented in the tone and depth of comic books/graphic novels, and what a huge influence and touchstone this book must be.

But in terms of pure individual reaction? Well, it was kind of like when I finally saw The French Connection. There's all this build up about The French Connection and what a great car chase it has and how influential it was and how it marked the birth of a new type of movie anti-hero who inhabited a realistic moral grey zone, blah, blah, blah. And then when you finally see it, you've seen so many subsequent films that were influenced by it that the original seems old hat. Having seen Ronin, I was not blown away by the car chase in The French Connection. So, my reaction to Watchmen was colored by the fact that I have only been exposed to comic books in a post-Watchmen world. I didn't read comics when I was young. Everything I know about comics I've learned from Aaron Matthew Polk, and he's a huge Watchmen fan, so I had already absorbed the Watchmen worldview without ever having read the book.

Of course, it's good to have read it so I have a better chance of participating in or at least following along with comic geek conversations. Now I, too, can speculate on casting should a Watchmen movie ever get the green light, and I, too, can bemoan the eventual script's lack of fidelity to the source material, and I, too, can complain when they screw up the CGI on Doc Manhattan.

There should be some sort of merit badge that the girlfriends of geeks can earn--just like in the Girl Scouts, when you get a badge for selling a certain number of cookies, or the stickers and certificates earned by people who give a lot of blood, or the chips they give recovering alcoholics for a certain period of sobriety. I have earned my one comic book badge. It's like being a puny-colored belt of some kind in karate.

The point is, I appreciated the book, sort of in the same way that I might appreciate a text I was assigned to read for a class. I mean, I get Great Expectations, but I'm not going to read it again. (Who is crazier: Miss Havisham or Rorshach? Discuss.)
84 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Watchmen.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
December 9, 2007 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-15 of 15 (15 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

gamb I had much the same reaction--on some level, I did enjoy it, though it was, on the whole, an unsatisfying read. I was intrigued; I enjoyed it on an intellectual level, not a visceral level. It is like reading a classic novel for a class; I understand why, back then, it was considered incredible beyond belief, but since then a better author has come along and done the story better.


Troy David I like your geek girl friend badge idea...
Clever.



message 3: by Meryl (new) - added it

Meryl Rorschach is a homeboy. I liked the movie and I still feel I'm STILL going to read the graphic novel. Liked your review though.


Christina Loved your review. It's like you're in my head!


message 5: by Cory (new) - rated it 1 star

Cory Mrs. Havisham, definitely


Eric Mesa Your review is a great example of the trope "Seinfeld is Unfunny". Because, as you mention, you've only seen the results of this revolution in comics, it's not as amazing. It's kinda how the previous generation sees Catcher in the Rye as groundbreaking. I see it as a whiny kid playing hooky.


Ivan would love to know how you feel about the movie, in retrospect to the graphic narrative.


message 8: by Mikael (new)

Mikael Great review. Thanks. I think I suffer the same "post Watchmen" syndrome.


message 9: by Toby (new)

Toby Hill Yes, they're all mental. Or at least, as you say, seriously unbalanced in some way. But that was the point. You give a random bunch of people some powers and they will all have different ideas about justice, right and wrong, how to cure the ills of the planet, or if they should even bother at all. And it's probably likely to send them a bit nuts too. One of the main points is that they were ALL doing it the way they thought was the right way.
Many of the comic book writers and artists of today would agree with something Dave Mckean said in an interview: which is "..after Watchmen, I see no point in discussing Superheroes any longer".
So although I think you did, to a small degree, miss the point: I like your review.


message 10: by Toby (new)

Toby Hill Actually, just read Keelys review


Trish Toby wrote: "Yes, they're all mental. Or at least, as you say, seriously unbalanced in some way. But that was the point. You give a random bunch of people some powers and they will all have different ideas abou..."

Yeah, I did *get* that even though it might not be clear due to the facetiousness of the review.


Laural My husband needs a geek girlfriend badge. He's a geek himself, but he knew nothing about the deep levels of pure geekiness until I forced him to analyse why things are awesome instead of just accepting them as such. I love Watchmen, and I think there is sooooo much more to it than just a slap in the face to superhero-ness, but I see your point. There needs to be more celebration of literature that highlights the goodness in humanity, and that is easier to read. But....for geeky intellectuals like me who see the world somewhat coldly to begin with, the best way to see the light is to go through darkness, and for me personally, Watchmen did that rather well.


message 13: by Amanda (new) - added it

Amanda Sparkles so because I may be certifiably 'insane' I will like this comic series??


message 14: by Dee (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dee Rayolia If youre friend has Transmetropolitan, read it. People are crazy there too, but atleast its fun.


Elías Casella Oh, come on... Insane characters make rich stories...


back to top