Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MX-14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not redirecting because the proposed target don't mention MX-14 at all. Feel free to create the redirect if that changes. KTC (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MX-14 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

may not meet WP:PRODUCT.Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (gas) @ 20:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:03, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 01:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per Kvng and others. Since the entire content of the article is: "MX-14 is a Linux distrobution based on debian that was created by The AntiX and Mepis communities.", nothing much is lost in deleting it. If sources are found, it can be recreated without having lost anything. Note wp:PRODUCT states that any editor usually can just merge and redirect a product article into the main company article, without an AFD, but here there's nothing to merge and the redirect target would not be obvious. Redirect to either antiX or MEPIS seems not warranted, as those articles don't cover it, and I don't see why they should. --doncram 18:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Insufficient coverage from reliable sources for notability, no refs.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 23:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.